A vector with nonnegative entries that add up to 1 is called a probability vector. A stochastic matrix is a square matrix whose columns are probability vectors. A Markov chain is a sequence of probability vectors x0, x1, x2,.... together with a stochastic matrix P, such that x1=Px0, x2=Px1....Then the Markov chain described by the first order difference equation xi+1=Pxk for k=0,1,2.....
When a Markov chain of vectors in R^n describes a system or a sequence of experiments, the entries in xk, the probabilities that the system is in each of n possible states, or the probabilities that the outcome of the experiment is one of n possible outcomes. For this reason, xk is often called a state vector.
Example One: Examine a model for population movement between a city and its suburbs. The annual migration between these two parts of the metropolitan region was governed by the migration matrix M.
From:
City Suburbs
M = [.95 .03 ]
[.05 .97 ]
That is each year 5% of the population moved to the suburbs, and 3% of the suburban population moves to the city. The columns of M are probability vectors, so M is a stochastic matrix. Suppose the 2014 population of the region is 600,000 in the city and 400,000 in the suburbs. Then the initial distribution population in the region is given by x0. What is the distribution population in 2015? in 2016?
After one year, the population vector
[600,000
400,000]
changed to
[.95 .03 x 600,000] = [582,000]
[.05 .97 x 400,000] = [418,000]
If we divide by both sides of the this equation by the total population of 1 million, and use the fact that kMx= M(kx), we find that
[.95 .03 x .600 = [.582]
[.05 .97 x .400 = [.418]
The vector x1 = [.582
.418]
gives the population distribution in 2015. that is 58.2% of the region lived in the city and 41.8% lived in the suburbs. Similarly the population distribution in 2016 is described by a vector x2, where
x2 = Mx1 = [.95 .03 x .582] = [.565]
[.05 .97 x .418] =[.435]
gives the population distribution in 2016, that is 56.5% of the region lived in the city and 43.5% lived in the suburbs.
If P is a stochastic matrix, then the steady-state vector (or equilibrium vector) for P is a probability vector q such that pq=q it can be shown that every stochastic matrix has a steady-state vector.
Example two: The probability vector q = [.375
.625] is a steady state vector for the population migration matrix M, because
Mq = [.95 .03 x .375] = [.35625 + .01875] = [.375] q
[.05 .97 x .625] = [.01875 + .60625] = [.625] q
If the total populaiton in example one, is 1 million, then q in this example would correspond to having 375,000 persons in the city and 625,000 in the suburbs. At the end of one year, the migration out of the city would be (.05)(375,000) = 18,750 persons, and the migration into the city from the suburbs would be (0.3)(625,000) = 18,750 persons. As a result, the populaiton in the city would remain the same. Similarly, the suburban populaiton would be stable.
Theorem 18: If P is an mxn regular stochastic matrix, then P has a unique steady-state vector q. Further, xo is any initial state and xk+1 = Pxk, for k = 0,1,2,....then the Markov chain {xk} converges to q as k goes to infinity.
Examine Problem: On any given day a student is either healthy or ill. Of the students who are healthy today, 95% will be healthy tomorrow. Of the students who are ill today, 55% will still be ill tomorrow.
a.) What is the stochastic matrix for this situation?
b.) Suppose 20% of the students are ill on Monday. What faction or percentage of the students are likely to be ill on Tuesday or Wednesday?
c.) If a student is well today, what is the probability that he or she will be well two days from now?